Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 27609

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : February | Volume : 18 | Issue : 2 | Page : EC29 - EC33 Full Version

Evaluation of the Predictive Role of Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio and Mean Platelet Volume in Preterm Deliveries: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: February 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/68722.19077
Disha Sai M Chandavar, Jessica Minal, KS Rashmi

1. Undergraduate, Dr. Chandramma Dayananda Sagar Institute of Medical Education and Research, Dayananda Sagar University, Harohalli, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Dr. Chandramma Dayananda Sagar Institute of Medical Education and Research, Dayananda Sagar University, Harohalli, Karnataka, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dr. Chandramma Dayananda Sagar Institute of Medical Education and Research, Dayananda Sagar University, Harohalli, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Jessica Minal,
Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Dr. Chandramma Dayananda Sagar Institute of Medical Education and Research, Dayananda Sagar University, Harohalli, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: jes.minal@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Preterm birth is associated with high perinatal morbidity and mortality. Identifying women at risk for preterm labour early in pregnancy may improve pregnancy outcomes. Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Mean Platelet Volume (MPV) can be helpful in predicting preterm labour, as infection is an important factor in early preterm deliveries, with immunity playing a key role in preterm labour.

Aim: To evaluate the predictive role of the NLR and MPV in preterm deliveries.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care and research hospital from August 2022 to October 2023. Haematological and clinical data were retrieved for preterm deliveries (n=79, group I) and term deliveries (n=151, group II). The two groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, obstetric and laboratory findings, including maternal age, gravida, parity, birth weight, NLR, MPV, and haemoglobin levels. The data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 29.0. One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the mean values among different groups. Categorical values were evaluated with Pearson’s Chi-square test. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the diagnostic properties of the tests.

Results: The two groups showed no statistical difference in terms of demographic parameters such as the mother’s age (p-value=0.611), parity (p-value=0.798), and gravida (p-value=0.583). The NLR was higher in group I (5.8±5.01) compared to group II (4.3±1.75), and this difference was statistically significant with a p-value of <0.001. MPV was observed to be lower in group II (8.7±0.96) compared to group I (8.9±1.07); however, this difference was not statistically significant (p-value=0.128). The mean baby weight and mean maternal haemoglobin in group I were significantly lower compared to group II.

Conclusion: In this study, the NLR value was significantly higher in patients with preterm deliveries compared to term deliveries. This study highlights the role of NLR as an emerging predictor of preterm deliveries and emphasises that NLR, obtained from an inexpensive and routinely conducted haemogram, has the potential to be used as an early indicator of preterm deliveries.

Keywords

Complete blood count, Inflammation, Labour, Pregnancy outcome

Preterm delivery, defined as delivery before 37 weeks or 259 days of gestation, is classified into early preterm (<34 weeks) and late preterm (34-37 weeks) and is a significant factor contributing to perinatal morbidity and mortality (1),(2). In addition to the increased risk of mortality, children born preterm also face numerous challenges such as neurological deficits, learning disabilities, and respiratory problems (1). Predicting preterm birth becomes crucial for healthcare workers to be prepared for timely interventions (3). Developing strategies to improve access to effective care should be a research and operational priority, especially in developing countries like India (1). Inflammation and infection play important roles in the aetiology of preterm birth, and identifying non invasive methods or markers associated with these conditions may be crucial (2). Unfortunately, currently, there is a lack of effective diagnostic parameters for predicting preterm labour and its outcomes (1).

An increase in the number of leukocytes or neutrophils in subclinical inflammation is due to the systemic response to intrauterine infection regulated by the natural immune system. Neutrophil counts increase, and lymphocyte counts decrease, resulting in an increased NLR in spontaneous preterm birth. NLR is an affordable, simple, and readily available parameter of stress and inflammation that reflects the potent relationship between the innate (neutrophils) and adaptive (lymphocytes) immune response during illness and diseased conditions (2). Clinical research has established the sensitivity of NLR for the diagnosis of systemic infection, sepsis, and its strong predictive and prognostic value (4). The role of NLR as an inflammatory parameter for the early prediction of preterm delivery has been explored in several studies; however, the results of these studies have been conflicting (4),(5),(6),(7). The normal range of NLR in healthy non geriatric adults is between 0.78 and 3.58 (8). Women with a high NLR may be more likely to experience preterm labour progressing to preterm birth (2).

MPV, a routinely performed automated whole blood count parameter, is indicative of platelet function and activity, and it reflects the size of platelets. It plays an important role in immunological and inflammatory events (2). The normal value of MPV is between 7.2 and 11.7 fL (9). In some chronic inflammatory disorders, an inverse correlation between disease activity and MPV has been demonstrated (2). In preterm labour, which is a highly inflammatory state, the consumption of large platelets at the site of inflammation causes a decrease in MPV levels (2).

Both of these indices, NLR and MPV are inexpensive and easily accessible parameters and they may serve as pivotal proinflammatory biomarkers in patients who experience preterm deliveries (2). Therefore, interpreting the possible role of NLR and MPV based on routinely conducted Complete Blood Count (CBC) parameters may help predict the occurrence of preterm labour and preterm deliveries, enabling better preparedness for pregnant women, obstetricians, and the healthcare team to perform the necessary interventions (4). Although the role of NLR in predicting preterm labour has been studied, regional research on the utility of this parameter is limited. The utility of MPV in predicting preterm labour also needs further exploration, as it is an area that has not been adequately researched. The current study may provide possible indications for identifying surrogate first-line indicators of preterm deliveries, which could be useful in facilities that lack resources or have limited resources to manage preterm deliveries and care for preterm babies. The aim of the study was to evaluate the predictive role of the NLR and MPV for preterm deliveries, and to assess if a cut-off value can be established for these two parameters to predict delivery outcomes.

Material and Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted in the Central Laboratory, Haematology section at Dr. Chandramma Dayananda Sagar Institute of Medical Education and Research, a tertiary care centre in Ramanagara, Karnataka, India, from August 2022 to October 2023. Ethics committee clearance for the study was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) (CDSIMER/MR/0048/IEC/2022). Since this was a retrospective study, a waiver of consent was granted.

Inclusion criteria: Pregnant women aged ≥18 years with available haematological records from the last/third trimester were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with induced labour, multiple pregnancies, anomalies of the female genital tract, and a history of smoking were excluded from the study.

Sample size: A convenience sample of 230 patients was selected for the study from August 2022 to December 2023. These patients were classified into two groups: preterm (delivery before 37 weeks, group I= 79) and term (delivery at or after 37 weeks, group II=151).

Study Procedure

Patient medical records and electronic data were retrieved, and the two groups were compared with respect to demographic specifications and obstetric findings such as maternal age, gravida, parity, infant gender, mode of delivery, and laboratory findings including NLR, MPV, and haemoglobin levels. Relevant patient details were obtained from the laboratory database and medical case records. All samples were analysed on a Beckman five-part haematology analyser, and the results were standardised by conducting external and internal quality control checks daily in accordance with laboratory protocols. CBC parameters from the third trimester were retrieved, and laboratory parameters including haemoglobin, NLR, and MPV were recorded for all participants during the third trimester. NLR was calculated by dividing the neutrophil count by the lymphocyte count obtained from the same run.

Statistical Analysis

The data were collected and analysed using the statistical software, SPSS version 29.0. The results were expressed as the mean±Standard Deviation (SD). Baseline demographic specifications of the study groups were described in terms of frequency, percentage, mean, and SD. Mean values between the groups were compared using one-way ANOVA. Categorical values were evaluated using Pearson’s Chi-square test. A two-tailed p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The diagnostic properties of significant tests were assessed using ROC curves. The optimal cut-off value for significant variables was determined, followed by the assessment of sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the ROC curve.

Results

A total of 230 patients were included in the study, consisting of 79 patients who gave birth before 37 weeks of gestation (preterm, group I) and 151 patients who delivered at or after 37 weeks of gestation (term, group II).

The mothers’ ages in the entire dataset ranged from 18 to 37 years, with an average age of 25.1±4.4 years. The average birth weight of the babies was 2.7±0.54 kg, ranging from 0.9 kg to 4.3 kg. The average NLR was 4.8±3.3, and the average MPV was 8.8±1.01 fL for the entire dataset of 230 patients. There were no statistically significant differences between group I and group II in terms of demographic parameters such as mother’s age, parity, and gravida (Table/Fig 1).

There were statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of baby’s birth weight and haemoglobin. The mean birth weight in group I was lower (2.3±0.59 kg) compared to group II (2.9±0.37 kg), and this difference was statistically significant (p-value <0.001). The mean maternal haemoglobin in group I was 11.5±1.51 g/dL, which was significantly lower compared to group II (12.0±1.43 g/dL) (p-value=0.013). NLR was higher in the preterm group I (5.8±5.01) compared to the term group I (4.3±1.75), and this difference was statistically significant with a p-value <0.001. MPV was slightly lower in the term group (8.7±0.96 fL) compared to the preterm group (8.9±1.07 fL), but this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.128) (Table/Fig 1).

Further analysis of the preterm groups with respect to early preterm (<34 weeks) and late preterm (34-37 weeks) showed no significant differences between the different laboratory parameters (Table/Fig 2).

ROC curve analysis to study the diagnostic value of NLR in predicting preterm deliveries showed that an NLR >4.33 had a sensitivity of 53% and specificity of 67% (Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4).

Among the other laboratory parameters for the total samples, the mother’s haemoglobin was positively correlated with the baby’s birth weight and negatively correlated with MPV. Neutrophil count and NLR were positively correlated as expected. Other observations included a negative correlation between NLR and the baby’s birth weight (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

In the current study, the predictive role of inflammatory markers such as NLR and MPV in preterm and term deliveries was investigated. It was observed that NLR was significantly higher in group I compared to group II. The diagnostic value of NLR in predicting preterm deliveries before 37 weeks demonstrated that an NLR >4.33 had a sensitivity of 53% and specificity of 67%. On the other hand, MPV was found to be lower in group II compared to group I, but this difference was not statistically significant. Therefore, MPV did not have a role in predicting the timing of deliveries. The observation of lower MPV in group II compared to the preterm group I is intriguing and warrants further validation in future studies.

Preterm delivery, defined as delivery before 37 weeks of gestation, is a significant factor contributing to perinatal morbidity and mortality, with long-term implications (1). Various factors such as stress, infection, placental disorders like abruption and placenta previa, prior history of preterm birth or abortion, and inadequate maternal care contribute to preterm labour. Foetal inflammatory response syndrome, characterised by systemic inflammation and elevated interleukin-6 levels, is a key event in preterm labour initiation (10). Given the crucial role of inflammation in triggering preterm labour, markers associated with neutrophils may have a predictive role in preterm deliveries (4). This study aimed to investigate novel inflammatory markers for their predictive value in preterm and term deliveries.

The NLR has been found to have a correlation with the prognosis of systemic inflammatory diseases (3). NLR is a simple marker derived from a CBC and has previously been observed to be increased in pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, and hyperemesis gravidarum (11). MPV, on the other hand, reflects platelet function and activity and plays a significant role in immunological and inflammatory events (3). In highly inflammatory conditions like preterm labour, the consumption of large platelets at the site of inflammation leads to a reduction in MPV (2).

In a study conducted by Kurban Y et al., NLR was found to be higher in preterm births, which was consistent with the findings of present study (2). Similarly, Melissa CL et al., observed a significant elevation of NLR in patients with preterm labour (12). However, a study by Khatoon F et al., in the Indian population reported that although neutrophil levels were significantly elevated and lymphocytes were reduced in pregnant women with preterm labour, the NLR ratio itself was not significantly increased in the preterm labour group (13).

In a study by Christoforaki V et al., the NLR of pregnant women in the first trimester was compared between those who had a live birth at 37 weeks and those who experienced a miscarriage. There was no statistically significant difference in NLR between the two groups, with values of 2.5±1.0 and 2.9±1.5, respectively. However, NLR values higher than 5.8 were only found in the miscarriage group, suggesting a potential clinical utility that requires further validation (11).

Hershko Klement A et al., investigated NLR values during pregnancy in both high-risk and normal-risk populations and found no difference between the two groups. They also noted that the peak value of NLR is reached during the second trimester, with these values positively correlating with age (14).

Another study by Ozel A et al., suggested that NLR values were significantly higher in the Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes (PPROM) group compared to the threatened preterm labour group and the healthy control group. They concluded that NLR can be a cost-effective parameter in the management of PPROM (15).

In the current study, MPV was observed to be lower in group II compared to group I; however, this difference was not statistically significant. This finding contradicts the results of Kurban Y et al., where a significant decrease in MPV was found in the preterm birth group compared to the term group (p-value <0.05) (2). Abd El-Rhaman Abd El-Fattah I et al., also investigated the role of MPV in predicting PPROM and found a positive correlation between these parameters, highlighting the potential of MPV in identifying patients at risk for PPROM (16). Platelet activation plays a significant role in the pathophysiology of infection, inflammation, and malignancy. However, there is a limited number of studies examining the role of MPV in term and preterm labour, which suggests the need for further research in this area. Ekin A et al., demonstrated that women with PPROM had significantly lower MPV values in the first trimester compared to controls (17). In present study, MPV was lower in the term group compared to the preterm group; however, this difference was not statistically significant. It’s worth noting that present study specifically examined MPV values in the third trimester.

Limitation(s)

The study was conducted as an exploratory research to identify and determine the predictive role of NLR and MPV in preterm deliveries, given the intriguing yet controversial literature on this topic. The limitations of the present study were the small size of the study group and the lack of adjustment for potential confounders such as medications, chronic diseases like coronary heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and stress among the study groups. Although this study was cross-sectional, only patients without risk factors have been included. However, it cannot exclude certain subgroups with elevated NLR due to underlying conditions. The authors’ preliminary observations in the present study therefore call for larger prospective case-control studies that may provide better insights and stronger evidence regarding the predictive role of these parameters.

Conclusion

Preterm deliveries remain a critical healthcare issue, especially in developing countries like India. There is a need to predict these events to enhance preparedness and improve access to effective care for preterm deliveries. The findings of this study demonstrate that the NLR value was significantly higher in patients with preterm delivery compared to term deliveries. Present study aimed to emphasise the role of NLR as an emerging predictor of preterm deliveries. Authors believe that NLR, obtained from an inexpensive and routinely performed haemogram has the potential to serve as an early indicator of preterm deliveries. Prospective studies with larger datasets and rigorous methodologies are necessary to validate the observations made in this study.

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to acknowledge the laboratory staff especially the non-teaching staff for their role and help in this study.

References

1.
Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Requejo JH, et al. Worldwide incidence of preterm birth: A systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(1):31-38. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Kurban Y, Alan Y, Uyar I, Atak Z, Aydemir Ö, Öktem A. Investigation of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and mean platelet volume in patients diagnosed with preterm labour. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2021;40:39-43. Doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.05.008. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Tolunay HE, Elci E. Importance of haemogram parameters for prediction of the time of birth in women diagnosed with threatened preterm labour. J Int Med Res. 2020;48(4):300060520918432. Doi: 10.1177/0300060520918432. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Vakili S, Torabinavid P, Tabrizi R, Shojazadeh A, Asadi N, Hessami K. The Association of inflammatory biomarker of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio with spontaneous preterm delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mediators Inflamm. 2021;2021:6668381. Doi: 10.1155/2021/6668381. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Ma M, Zhu M, Zhuo B, Li L, Chen H, Xu L, et al. Use of complete blood count for predicting preterm birth in asymptomatic pregnant women: A propensity score-matched analysis. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34(8):e23313. Doi: 10.1002/jcla.23313. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Isik H, Aynioglu O, Sahbaz A, Arikan I, Karçaaltincaba D, Sahin H, et al. Can plateletcrit, an underestimated platelet parameter, be related with preterm labour? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;35(7):676-80. Doi: 10.3109/01443615.2015.1004530. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Daglar HK, Kirbas A, Kaya B, Kilincoglu F. The value of complete blood count parameters in predicting preterm delivery. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2016;20(5):801-05.
8.
Forget P, Khalifa C, Defour JP, Latinne D, Van Pel MC, De Kock M. What is the normal value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio? BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):12. Doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2335-5. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Demirin H, Ozhan H, Ucgun T, Celer A, Bulur S, Cil H, et al. Normal range of mean platelet volume in healthy subjects: Insight from a large epidemiologic study. Thromb Res. 2011;128(4):358-60. Doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.05.007. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
( Suman V, Luther EE. Preterm Labour. 2023 Aug 8. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. PMID: 30725624.
11.
Christoforaki V, Zafeiriou Z, Daskalakis G, Katasos T, Siristatidis C. First trimester Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and pregnancy outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;40(1):59-64. Doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1606171. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Melissa CL, Aaron HG, Jonathan HBS, Angel GR, James A. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and red cell distribution width levelsin preterm vs term births. J Mol Genet Med. 2018;12(1):317. Doi: 10.4172/1747-0862.1000317. [crossref]
13.
Khatoon F, Gupta H, Sinha P, Tiwari K, Singh A. Prediction of preterm birth on the basis of complete blood count parameters. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae. 2020;12(5):288-90. [crossref]
14.
Hershko Klement A, Hadi E, Asali A, Shavit T, Wiser A, Haikin E, et al. Neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio and platelets to lymphocytes ratio in pregnancy: A population study. PLoS One. 2018;13(5):e0196706. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196706. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Ozel A, Alici Davutoglu E, Yurtkal A, Madazli R. How do platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio change in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes, and threaten preterm labour? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020;40(2):195-99. Doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1621807.[crossref][PubMed]
16.
Abd El-Rhaman, Abd El-Fattah I, Mohammed Zakaria AE, Ragab Abd El-Aziz B, Ahmed Rezk A. The role of platelet count and mean platelet volume during first trimester in prediction of preterm premature rupture of membranes. Al-Azhar Medical Journal. 2022;51(1):57-72. Doi: 10.21608/amj.2022.212581. [crossref]
17.
Ekin A, Gezer C, Kulhan G, Avci ME, Taner CE. Can platelet count and mean platelet volume during the first trimester of pregnancy predict preterm premature rupture of membranes? J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015;41(1):23-28. Doi: 10.1111/ jog.12484. Epub 2014 Aug 11. PMID: 25130327.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/68722.19077

Date of Submission: Nov 22, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Dec 08, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Dec 27, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 24, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 11, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Dec 23, 2023 (15%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com